Reading the Tea Leaves in the Beige Book

Nancy Anderson
Posted by



Finance is all about numbers. Rates of return, interest rates, currency rates, inflation, money supply, rate spreads, and on and on. Reams of numbers are produced, sliced, diced, crunched, tweaked, tortured, analyzed, and fricasseed to determine how well businesses are doing, whether or not to make a loan, whether to raise interest rates or cut them, whether to hire workers or lay them off, whether to buy stocks, bonds, Treasuries, or gold -- in short, in order to make just about any move in finance, there have to be numbers backing up the decision.

And yet one of the most widely read documents produced by the Federal Reserve is actually short on them. That document is the "Beige Book," more formally known as the "Summary of Commentary on Current Economic Conditions by Federal Reserve District." Issued eight times a year, the "Beige Book" is a highly impressionistic survey of the nation's economic landscape, based on conversations staff at the 12 Federal Reserve Banks have with businesses in their regions.

Instead of serving up hard figures on total tourist traffic, the Beige Book will talk about what the operator of a ski lodge in Montana said about bookings when contacted by someone at the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Instead of providing percentage changes in mine output, in its pages one finds general terms -- "strong," "weak," "modest," "robust" -- based on conversations with some unspecified numbers of mine operators. And the impressions vary from region to region. The Third Federal Reserve District, for instance, includes many farms in southern New Jersey and eastern Pennsylvania, but there's nary a word about agriculture in the Third District's report in the current Beige Book; in contrast, talk of agriculture takes up a good chunk of the reports from the Eighth, Ninth and Tenth Districts, which contain most of the nation's breadbasket.

One of the few things discussed in every district in more than passing terms is banking and finance - understandable for an economic survey from the nation's central bank. But even here, there are variations in emphasis and detail depending on the region. And once again, the most notable absence from the reports are numbers.

Given this, it would seem to me that bottom-line-oriented financial types should find this report nearly useless. Yet it's followed and commented upon every bit as much as the meetings of the Federal Open Market Committee, which sets the central bank's interest rates.

So what does this say about the financial sector and the larger economy? First, it says that soft data - impressions, sentiments, expectations, attitudes - matter just as much as hard numbers do in making economic decisions. It also says that one can gain as much knowledge about the economy by just talking to people as by poring over statistics. And finally, it suggests that even bankers enjoy a good read every once in a while.

By: Sandy Smith

Sandy Smith is an award-winning writer and editor who has spent most of his career in public relations and corporate communications. His work has appeared in The Philadelphia Inquirer, the Philadelphia CityPaper, PGN, and a number of Web sites. Philly-area residents may also recognize him as "MarketStEl" of discussion-board fame. He has been a part of the great reserve army of freelance writers since January 2009 and is actively seeking opportunities wherever they may lie.

Comment

Become a member to take advantage of more features, like commenting and voting.

Jobs to Watch